Can I suggest we don’t use geographic terms in provisional lineage/cluster labels? Avid virological.org readers will know what you mean by “European” or “Italy” clusters, but whatever names we use now could quickly get entrenched. The names don’t reflect the fact that these lineages have been found on multiple continents, and could be quickly outdated if the focus of infection moves elsewhere. Let’s use A, B, C, or some version of flu-like lineage labelling?